What does the OpenLLM Leaderboard measure?
Date : 2023-11-07
Introduction
In this report, the author used Zeno to dive into the data and explore what the benchmark actually measures. What tasks does it test? What does the data look like? They find that it is indeed hard to gauge the real-world usability of LLMs from the results of the leaderboard, as the tasks it includes are disconnected from how LLMs are used in practice. Furthermore, they find clear ways the leaderboard can be gamed, such as by exploiting the common structure of ground truth labels. In sum, they hope that this report demonstrates the importance of testing your model in a disaggregated way on on data that is representative of the downstream use-cases you care about.
Read article here
Recently on :
Artificial Intelligence
WEB - 2025-11-13
Measuring political bias in Claude
Anthropic gives insights into their evaluation methods to measure political bias in models.
WEB - 2025-10-09
Defining and evaluating political bias in LLMs
OpenAI created a political bias evaluation that mirrors real-world usage to stress-test their models’ ability to remain objecti...
WEB - 2025-07-23
Preventing Woke AI In Federal Government
Citing concerns that ideological agendas like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are compromising accuracy, this executive ...
WEB - 2025-07-10
America’s AI Action Plan
To win the global race for technological dominance, the US outlined a bold national strategy for unleashing innovation, buildin...
WEB - 2024-12-30
Fine-tune ModernBERT for text classification using synthetic data
David Berenstein explains how to finetune a ModernBERT model for text classification on a synthetic dataset generated from argi...