
AI Safety and the Age of Dislightenment
Abstract
Proposals for stringent AI model licensing and surveillance will likely be ineffective or counterproductive, concentrating power in unsustainable ways, and potentially rolling back the societal gains of the Enlightenment. The balance between defending society and empowering society to defend itself is delicate. We should advocate for openness, humility and broad consultation to develop better responses aligned with our principles and values — responses that can evolve as we learn more about this technology with the potential to transform society for good or ill.
Read entire article on the fast.ai website
Recently on :
Artificial Intelligence
Regulations | Policy
Security | Surveillance | Privacy
PITTI - 2026-07-14
What Happens When AI Agents Have to Find Their Own Market?
Implementation of the Scaling Trust project : early lessons from simulating discovery, negotiation, and trust between autonomou...
PITTI - 2026-03-05
Scaling Trust : a Missing Piece in Multi-Agent Worlds
Humanity’s ability to build complex civilizations relies on an "invisible infrastructure" - the shared culture, institutions, a...
PITTI - 2026-01-14
Cultural, Ideological and Political Bias in LLMs
Transcription of a talk given during the work sessions organized by Technoréalisme on December 9, 2025, in Paris. The talk pres...
WEB - 2025-11-13
Measuring political bias in Claude
Anthropic gives insights into their evaluation methods to measure political bias in models.
WEB - 2025-10-09
Defining and evaluating political bias in LLMs
OpenAI created a political bias evaluation that mirrors real-world usage to stress-test their models’ ability to remain objecti...